This paper sets out a strategy calling for a radical overhaul of the manner in which both the EU and aspiring member states define and implement what the Copenhagen criteria refer to as the “Rule of Law” in pursuit of the elusive goal of sustainability. While pointing to the limits of the current “anatomical method” centered on legal and institutional checklists, the paper stresses the existence of a fundamental dilemma between, on the one hand, the need to be more ambitious in assessing and promoting the “Rule of Law” and, on the other hand, the imperative to exercise humility and restraint regarding the claims made by the EU on behalf of “Rule of Law” assessment and assistance.
Rethinking Europe's « Rule of Law » and Enlargement Agenda
The Fundamental Dilemma
Policy analysis
SIGMA Papers
Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Abstract
In the same series
-
18 December 2024
-
29 April 2024
-
Policy analysis25 May 2023
Related publications
-
18 December 2024
-
29 April 2024
-
2 December 2022
-
Policy analysis22 October 2021
-
19 May 2021
-
2 February 2021